PVC Has No StorageClass
The claim depends on a cluster default that can change, so the same manifest can bind to different storage, or to nothing at all, in another cluster.
Free to start. No card. The playground just needs your work email.
AWSAzureGoogle CloudKubernetes
Found, explained, handed over.
Where the estate departs from your policies, frameworks and tagging rules.
Detect
ZopNight checks this automatically across AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, with read-only access to the account.
Explain
Every finding says exactly what to change: Set a storage class on the persistent volume claim.
Fix
The finding opens with the change already spelled out, so the fix is one ticket, not an investigation.
- Applies to
- EKS Persistent Volume Claims on AWS, AKS Persistent Volume Claims on Azure, GKE Persistent Volume Claims on Google Cloud
- Category
- Governance. Missing tags and labels that break cost attribution, such as no environment, team or cost-centre value.
- Where it appears
- The Compliance tab of Recommendations, with every affected resource listed.
- Rule IDs
RC-1769RC-1869RC-1969
Related checks
See the governance findings in your account.
Connect a read-only role and the first pass runs on your own estate. This check, and the rest of the catalogue, with it.
Prefer to talk it through first? Book 20 minutes with the team.
- $30M+annualised cloud spend under management
- 550K+resources tracked since launch
- 20-60%off the bill in the first month
- SOC 2Type II report, plus ISO 27001
Figures published on zop.dev.